Evaluation by trial trenching in advance of redevelopment, by G R Pattison of SCAU for Surrey County Council, revealed two medieval ditches, possibly early field boundaries, and an undated hearth and gully.

Observation of foundation trenches by S P Dyer for SCAU and the Hancock Ward Company did not reveal anything of archaeological interest, probably because of levelling at some time in the past. (279)

Observation of works within the Cage by S P Dyer for SCAU and the Hancock Ward Company located two floor levels, but the lowest is thought to have been not more than 100 years old. There were no other discoveries of archaeological interest. (279)

Evaluation in advance of proposed groundworks, by Graham Hayman of SCAU for Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, confirmed that the moat embankment is of relatively recent construction, but that it had buried a 13th century bank of roughly similar alignment.

Evaluation in advance of a new access road to the rear of the High Street, by Graham Hayman of SCAU for Reigate & Banstead Borough Council, located a shallow ditch orientated north-south. No finds were recovered from the ditch, but it was sealed by a layer in which a few sherds of medieval pottery had been found.

Evaluation trial trenching by S P Dyer for SCAU and SCC did not reveal anything of archaeological interest. (278)

Evaluation by trial trenching and observation of foundation trenches carried out by S P Dyer for SCAU and Linden Homes PLC did not locate anything of archaeological interest. (279)

Evaluation by trial trenching prior to redevelopment, by Graham Hayman of SCAU for Tudor Estates Ltd, revealed no features of archaeological interest.

Evaluation by trial trenching prior to redevelopment, by Graham Hayman of SCAU for Berkeley Homes (Surrey & Thames Valley) Ltd, revealed no features of archaeological interest.

Site watching of garage construction by S P Dyer for SCAU did not reveal anything of archaeological interest. (278)